A case report is a descriptive, exploratory or explanatory analysis of a person, group or phenomena. An case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles.
Case studies may be prospective in which criteria are established and cases fitting the criteria are included as they become available
or retrospective in which criteria are established for selecting cases from historical records for inclusion in the study.
The case that is the subject of the inquiry will be an instance of a class of phenomena that provides an analytical frame — an object — within which the study is conducted and which the case illuminates and explicates. Data collection in a case study occurs over a period of time.
-
Rarity of a condition almost always meets the criterion of worthiness of a case report
-
Newness of a case
-
Case teaches a lesson
-
if it increases awareness of a condition, suggests the proper diagnostic strategy, or demonstrates a more cost-effective approach to management.
-
A case can be presented because it represents an unusual presentation of a relatively common condition.
-
A case can be presented because it is an unusual complication of a disease and its management.
Case must be relevant
Title and Author Information: The title is a summary of the abstract itself and should convince the reader that the topic is important, relevant, and innovative. Make the title short, descriptive, and interesting. Some organizations require a special format for the title, such as all uppercase letters. Be sure to check the instructions. Following the title, include the names of authors followed by their institutional affiliations. Deciding upon the authorship of a case report can be tricky. In the past, it was acceptable to include as authors those contributing to the management of the patient, but this is no longer true. Currently, it is expected that the authors contribute significantly to the intellectual content of the case report. It is assumed that the first author will present the work if the abstract is accepted. The first author may need to meet certain eligibility requirements in order to present the abstract, for example, be a member of the professional society sponsoring the research meeting. This information is always included with the abstract instructions.
Introduction: Most case report abstracts begin with a short introduction. This typically describes the context of the case and explains its relevance and importance. However, it is perfectly acceptable to begin directly with the description of the case.
Case Description: When reporting the case, follow the basic rules of medical communication; describe in sequence the history, physical examination, investigative studies, and the patient's progress and outcome. The trick is to be complete without obscuring the essence of the case with irrelevant details.
Discussion: The main purpose of the discussion is to review why decisions were made and extract the lesson from the case. Not uncommonly, reports from the literature, or their absence, are cited that either directly support or contradict the findings of the case. Be wary of boasting that your case is the "first" to describe a particular phenomenon, since even the most thorough searches often fail to reveal all instances of similar cases. Keep in mind that the best case report abstracts are those that make a small number of teaching points (even just one) in clear and succinct language.
When writing the abstract, avoid the use of medical jargon and excessive reliance on abbreviations. Limit abbreviations to no more than three, and favor commonly used abbreviations. Always spell out the abbreviations the first time they are mentioned unless they are commonly recognized (e.g., CBC).
It typically takes several days to write a good abstract, and the process should not be undertaken alone. Get help from a mentor who is not familiar with the case; such mentors can quickly point out areas that are unclear or demand more detail. Make revisions based upon the feedback. Finally, have others read your draft in order to check for technical errors, such as spelling and grammar mistakes. Reading the abstract out loud is another good way to catch awkward phrasing and word omissions. Finally, a Clinical Vignette Abstract Checklist and an example of a clinical vignette abstract
are available to help you with the process of writing a successful abstract.
Example
Coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome in a 51-year-old man with immune thrombocytopenic purpura: a case report
Bora Demircelik, Meltem Altinsoy, Fadime Bozduman, Mahmut Gunes, Muzaffer Cakmakand Beyhan Eryonucu
Journal of Medical Case Reports 2014, 8:214 doi:10.1186/1752-1947-8-214
Published: 20 June 2014Introduction
Treatment of the rare cases of patients with chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura with acute coronary syndrome can be a significant problem. The patient in our case report was treated successfully with percutaneous coronary intervention.
Case presentation
A 51-year-old man of Turkish origin who had idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura was admitted to our hospital with severe chest pain. His electrocardiography was normal on admission but dynamic ischemic changes were observed during follow-up. He underwent immediate coronary angiography. In his angiography, left anterior descending artery stenosis was 90% together with the diagonal ostium. Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed successfully. Bleeding complications were not observed after the procedure.
Conclusions
We report the presence of a rare case of chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in a patient with acute coronary syndrome. In this situation a serious multidisciplinary approach is required before coronary intervention.
Content 4
USMLE Reviewer (Subscription Required)